The question of if learning is observable is one which interests me quite a bit due to a reading I just completed in another class of mine. An article written by Gert Biesta entitled “Mind The Gap!” Communication and the Educational Relation found in the book No Education Without Relation addresses notions of how exactly education and learning takes place. Biesta says that learning takes place in a gap between the student and the teacher in their communication with one another. Biesta notes that this gap, and subsequent event of learning is indefinable, as the act of learning is a transformation of understanding from what a teacher says, to what the student comprehends. Possibly as a result of my just finishing this reading, I feel like I completely and utterly agree with this theory or learning. Thus, it would lead me to answer this week’s topic question by saying that learning is not observable, but perhaps the results of learning are.
The act of learning is something which is individual, and each student pulls different understanding and meaning from lessons. While a student may have not understood in the exact way that a teacher intended, the student should not be classified as not learning anything. Due to different backgrounds and experiences in a students life, their relation to teachers and subjects creates multi-faceted understandings of singular ideas. I think that transformation of understanding is something that cannot be observed. What can be observed however is the result of these transformations.
Even though a student may gain a different understanding of a topic, the results of this is what is interesting and important. While a teacher may see a students lack of understanding of exactly what they wanted to communicate as frustrating, a interdisciplinary classroom would encourage and thrive on these sorts of transformations. (Yes, once again my preference for interdisiciplinarity arises). By creating an inclusive classroom setting, which offers any different ways of teaching, I feel that the worry to reach such strict learning goals will become more relaxed while still accomplishing what is needed to my learned. Not to mention that this sort of environment would most surely aid in the eradication of extrovert and introvert personalities, as everyone would be able to communicate and work within settings and modes of thought/communication, that they are comfortable with.
In thinking about how the results of learning can be observed, my rudimentary thoughts are things like looking at student engagement, their body language, vocalization in class, and work ethics of students. I find that often if a student is idle within the classroom, it is because they are either not paying attention, but more prevalently, that they are still mulling over and trying to comprehend what they are being taught. If a student is doing any of these things, I feel as if there is some thought process going on, that result in some sort of transformation of information. While it is hard to track in progress, after a lesson has been communicated and released into “the gap,” all be can do as educators is wait for the result that comes out the other side by our students.
1 comment:
Sara I enjoyed reading your thought provoking post!
I searched for "Mind the Gap" but cannot find it available electronically (you dont happen to have a scanned copy do you?).
In fact the thesis-arc of that whole book looks great! (It doesn't hurt that the wonderful Nel Noddings wrote the into, either :)
I was a reluctant applicant to the Teaching Ed. program. I have seen more than my share of lame teaching. However it's work like this that inspires me! Old teaching methods and models designed under direct influence of the dirty industrial revolution are finally being questioned and discarded.
Thank God!
Education can be so much more engaging and exciting! It's time to end our complicit participation in educational systems that strangle the natural joy of learning in our growing kids!
"Mind the Gap" reminded me of the longing I felt when I first learned about the pedagogy of Ancient Greek Philosophers:
these 'masters' would enter into dialogue and conversation with their students; they would sit around under and olive tree and engage one another in the relational process of education. It was unthinkable to dissociate the relationship from the learning process. (Hence Plato's *dialogues*; the fact that Socrates never wrote a word himself, and yet his philosophical contributions live on today!etc.)
How far we have come now, when it has become the norm to expect students like me to basically have to take one or two distance education courses if we want to finish our education degree (with no human contact at all!).
What are the implications of a *relational* pedagogy for today's *digital* age, in which we consider it more and more normal to have only mediated, out-of-body "relationships" (social network sites; texting; online (only) courses; etc.)?
I think we are not being careful with ourselves. We have bodies for a reason; bodies need to be part of our relationships. We occupy space and time; something is lost when we disconnect our relationships and our learning from these realities.
I like the way technology is used in this course for example: this blog is not meant to *replace* but to build on flesh-and-blood, time-and-space contact we all have with each other.
Anyway, thanks again Sara for the thought provoking post!
-Mark
Post a Comment